Draft
Conversation
Member
Author
|
ping @mjpieters, @dargueta |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Type of changes
Checklist
Description
Closes #425
Changes the expected behaviour of
FS.islinkin tests so that is never raisesResourceNotFound, to be consistent withFS.isfileandFS.isdir.Changes the base
FS.islinkimplementation to one that usesFS.gettypeto check if the resource type issymlink.Closes #411
Fixes the behaviour of the following
OSFSmethods so that they work as expected:OSFS.islink(path): returnsTrueon existing path to a symlink,FalseotherwiseOSFS.gettype(path): returnsResourceType.symlinkis the path maps to a symlink (not the case before)OSFS.getinfo(path): works even ifpathis a dangling symlink (TODO)OSFS.scandir(dir): works even ifdircontains a dangling symlink (TODO)